§ 7207. Court Orders
TITLE 1: GOVERNMENT DIVISION 7: PLANNING, BUDGETING AND AUDITING § 7207. Court Orders. (a) Except for funds appropriated for settlements and awards, no court may require the disbursement of funds from the Commonwealth Treasury or order the reprogramming of funds in order to provide for such disbursement. Any final judgment of a court shall be paid only pursuant to an item of appropriations for settlements and awards. (b) Nonwithstanding subsection (a), the Governor of the Commonwealth is authorized and empowered to negotiate settlement and payment of judgments entered against the government. Such settlement may include offsets and credits on any tax obligation or other obligations of the claimants or members of their immediate family or third parties who may have such obligations and payments of cash from the Commonwealth General Fund or other funds set aside for payments of judgments; including all other settlement methods, authorized by law, other than cash as agreed by the parties. Source: PL 3-68, § 207; redesignated as subsection (a) and subsection (b) added by PL 18-37 § 2 (Feb. 23, 2014). Commission Comment: Public Law 18-37 did not specify where its content was to be codified. The Commission codified it as subsection (b) of this section pursuant to 1 CMC § 3806(a). The Commission substituted the phrase “subsec- tion (a)” for “1 CMC § 7207” pursuant to 1 CMC § 3806(d). PL 18-37 contained, in addition to savings and severability clauses, the fol- lowing Short Title and Findings and Purpose sections: Section 1. Short Title. This Act may be cited as “The Judgment Set- tlement Act of 2013.” Section 2. Findings and Purpose. The Legislature acknowledges that an identical bill was passed in the Seventeenth Legislature in 2011, but the governor vetoed the bill. The governor’s veto message noted that claimants would be allowed to circumvent the legislative appropriation power “while impacting the General Fund by offsetting and crediting tax obligations.” The veto message further noted that the language of the bill is broad and it does not provide defined boundaries of negotiations, which may cause more harm to the General Fund and other government agencies. The terms of the settlement negotiations as agreed by the par- ties should define the boundaries. The legislature is also cognizant that there are 17 judgments amount- ing to over 34,250 and the highest is 123,400,000 after adjusting for debt service appropriations,
TITLE 1: GOVERNMENT DIVISION 7: PLANNING, BUDGETING AND AUDITING earmarked funds, and other legal obligations. With the identified revenue available for the 2014 Budget, and most likely true for subsequent budg- ets, it is clearly unlikely to satisfy the existing judgments. Additionally, the Legislature recognizes that a judgment claimant may seek an equita- ble remedy in a Federal court that may bypass the legislative appropria- tion process to satisfy a judgment. Therefore, it is necessary to find other ways to satisfy or at least reduce the existing government judgments. The purpose of this Act is to authorize the governor to negotiate set- tlements and resolve the enormous government liability. Claimants should be provided the opportunity to consider other methods of judg- ment satisfaction other than cash payment as it will benefit the Com- monwealth. Such method would authorize the Governor to negotiate with the claimants to effectuate a reasonably prompt and equitable resolution of the judgments.
Source: CNMI Law Revision Commission